Fighting Pregnancy Exclusions: How AI Advocacy Tools Can Protect Your End-of-Life Wishes

<aside>

Published: November 14, 2025

Reading Time: 6 minutes

</aside>

<aside>

⚠️ Critical Healthcare Alert

In 34 U.S. states, pregnancy exclusion laws can void your advance directives. Most patients don't discover this until it's too late.

</aside>

The Hidden Crisis in Patient Rights

In 34 U.S. states, a positive pregnancy test can void your medical autonomy. These "pregnancy exclusion" laws invalidate advance directives for pregnant individuals, forcing unwanted medical interventions even against explicit wishes. Michigan recently made headlines when patients and physicians filed a lawsuit challenging the state's pregnancy exclusion law that denies incapacitated pregnant patients the right to refuse life-sustaining treatment.

"As a woman and a mother, it's infuriating to know that my body can still be regulated more than it's respected. The pregnancy exclusion clause isn't about safety or care. It's about control."— Nikki Sapiro Vinckier, Michigan lawsuit plaintiff

Understanding Pregnancy Exclusion Laws

What Are Pregnancy Exclusion Laws?

Pregnancy exclusion laws are provisions in state legislation that automatically invalidate a person's advance directive—a legal document specifying medical treatment preferences—if they become pregnant. These laws override explicit healthcare wishes, forcing life-sustaining treatment regardless of the individual's documented preferences.

The Scope of the Problem

• 34 states currently have pregnancy exclusion provisions
• These laws affect millions of people of reproductive age
• Most patients are unaware their advance directives can be voided
• The laws apply even in cases of non-viable pregnancy or severe fetal abnormalities

The Michigan Challenge: A Landmark Case

The Michigan lawsuit represents a critical turning point in challenging these restrictive laws. Plaintiffs argue that pregnancy exclusion provisions:

• Violate bodily autonomy and constitutional rights
• Discriminate based on sex and pregnancy status
• Force medical interventions against explicit patient wishes
• Create dangerous precedents for government control over medical decisions